The best quotes from "The Master and Margarita". The Master and Margarita quotes, aphorisms, phrases Bulgakov there are no evil people

…Nonsense! In three hundred years this will pass.

...never ask for anything! Never and nothing, and especially among those who are stronger than you. They will offer and give everything themselves!

...but here’s the question that worries me: if there is no God, then, the question arises, who controls human life and the entire order on earth in general? - The man himself controls

...he wasn't verbose this time. The only thing he said was that among human vices, he considers cowardice to be one of the most important.

...what would your good do if evil did not exist, and what would the earth look like if shadows disappeared from it?

In a white cloak with a bloody lining and a shuffling cavalry gait, early in the morning of the fourteenth day of the spring month of Nisan, the procurator of Judea, Pontius Pilate, came out into the covered colonnade between the two wings of the palace of Herod the Great.

In our country, atheism does not surprise anyone

After all, you think about how you can be dead.

Which country's wine do you prefer at this time of day?

Everything will be right - the world is built on this

Everything was mixed up in the Oblonskys’ house, as the famous writer Leo Tolstoy rightly put it.

All power is violence against people.

The second freshness is nonsense! There is only one freshness - the first, and it is also the last. And if the sturgeon is second freshness, then this means that it is rotten!

Do you judge by the suit? Never do this. You can make a mistake, and a very big one at that.

Eyes are a significant thing. Like a barometer. You can see who has a great dryness in their soul, who can poke the toe of a boot into their ribs for no reason, and who is afraid of everyone.

Yes, man is mortal, but that would not be so bad. The bad thing is that he is sometimes suddenly mortal, that's the trick!

Housekeepers know everything - it is a mistake to think that they are blind.

Why pursue in the footsteps of what is already over?

There are no evil people in the world, there are only unhappy people.

The most interesting thing about this lie is that it is a lie from the first to the last word.

History will judge us.

Everyone will be rewarded according to their faith.

A brick will never fall on anyone’s head for no reason at all.

Love jumped out in front of us, like a killer jumps out of the ground in an alley, and struck us both at once! That's how lightning strikes, that's how a Finnish knife strikes!

People are like people. They love money, but this has always been the case... Humanity loves money, no matter what it is made of, whether leather, paper, bronze or gold. Well, frivolous... well, well... ordinary people... in general, they resemble the previous ones ... the housing issue only spoiled them ...

Maestro! Shorten the march!

We are talking to you in different languages, as always, but the things we talk about don’t change...

I don’t understand! They sat peacefully, completely quietly, having a snack...

I don’t play pranks, I don’t hurt anyone, I fix the primus stove, and I also consider it my duty to warn that the cat is an ancient and inviolable animal.

No document, no person.

No, wait... I know what I'm getting into. But I go to any lengths because of him, because I have no hope for anything else in the world. But I want to tell you that if you destroy me, you will be ashamed! Yes, it's a shame! I'm dying for love!

Never be afraid of anything. It's unreasonable

Never ask for anything. Never ask for anything, and especially from those who are stronger than you. They will offer and give everything themselves!

Well, the one who loves must share the fate of the one he loves.

He didn't deserve light, he deserved peace

She carried yellow flowers! Not a good color.

Congratulations, citizen, having lied!

For mercy's sake... would I allow myself to pour vodka for the lady? This is pure alcohol!

Go away. I haven’t had coffee yet, how can I leave?

It is easy and pleasant to speak the truth.

It's sometimes nice to linger on the festive midnight.

It's nice to hear that you treat your cat so politely. For some reason, cats are usually called “you,” although not a single cat has ever drunk brotherhood with anyone.

Manuscripts don't burn.

(estimates: 1 , average: 5,00 out of 5)

Mikhail Bulgakov is known as the most mystical and mysterious writer. He called himself “driven by wolves.” He once calculated that among 300 reviews of his works, only three were positive. But today his novels are dissected into quotes and aphorisms, they are read by millions of fans around the world, and the author himself is considered a great and talented person.

Bulgakov's quotes from his works touch on a variety of topics. He wrote about love, about women, about life. He also often thought about the topic of good and evil. One cannot but agree with Bulgakov’s statement such as “what would good do if there were no evil?”

“The Book of the Master and Margarita” is a mystical story about the present and the past, which are closely connected. There is mysticism here, but there is also the truth of life, sometimes cruel and insidious. Bulgakov's aphorisms from this work will reveal to you amazing world a writer who had his own vision on a variety of things - religion, love, mysticism.

Love is another important theme that is present in all the writer’s works. According to the author, tender feelings are the most beautiful thing that can happen in a person’s life. It is important to be able to support your soul mate, to live the life of the one you love. Perhaps, after reading these sayings, you will rethink your life a little, change yourself and change your values.

Don’t try to seem better to people than you really are - you won’t be able to stand on tiptoes for long... but don’t try to seem worse than you are - you won’t be able to stay on your haunches for long either... ALWAYS BE YOURSELF!

Is this vodka? - Margarita asked weakly.
The cat jumped up in his chair from offense.
“For mercy, queen,” he wheezed, “would I allow myself to pour vodka for the lady?” This is pure alcohol!

People are like people. They love money, but this has always been the case... Humanity loves money, no matter what it is made of, whether leather, paper, bronze or gold. Well, frivolous... well, well... ordinary people... in general, they resemble the old ones... the housing issue only spoiled them... (Woland)
(From the novel “The Master and Margarita”)

Never ask for anything! Never and nothing, especially from those who are stronger than you. They will offer everything themselves and give everything themselves!

He who loves must share the fate of the one he loves.

There are no evil people in the world, there are only unhappy people.

Why do you need the whole world if you don’t want to give it to anyone...

Honesty always leads to trouble.

What is the secret of your peace of mind?
“In full acceptance of the inevitable,” answered the Master.

You are free... Am I holding you?
- No, what kind of answer is that! No, you leave my memory, then I will be free...

Listen to the soundlessness,” Margarita said to the master, and the sand rustled under her bare feet, “listen and enjoy what you were not given in life - silence.” Look, there ahead is your eternal home, which was given to you as a reward. I can already see the Venetian window and the climbing grapes, it rises to the very roof. This is your home, this is your eternal home. I know that in the evening those whom you love, whom you are interested in and who will not alarm you will come to you. They will play for you, they will sing to you, you will see the light in the room when the candles are burning. You will fall asleep, putting on your greasy and eternal cap, you will fall asleep with a smile on your lips. Sleep will strengthen you, you will begin to reason wisely. And you won’t be able to drive me away. I will take care of your sleep.

The human personality is not so much intellect, but first of all will, character, and neglect of this cruelly avenges itself.

At first she cried for a long time. And then she became angry and despicable.

Who told you that there is no true, faithful, eternal love in the world? May the liar's vile tongue be cut out!
We speak different languages, as always, but the things we talk about do not change.
Evil lurks in men who avoid wine, games, the company of lovely women, and table conversation. Such people are either seriously ill or secretly hate those around them.
There are no evil people in the world, there are only unhappy people.
These women are difficult people!
A person without a surprise inside, in his box, is uninteresting.
Everything will be right, the world is built on this.
An unhappy person is cruel and callous. And all just because good people mutilated him.
Do you judge by the suit? Never do this. You can make a mistake, and a very big one at that.
Never ask for anything! Never and nothing, and especially among those who are stronger than you. They will offer and give everything themselves.
He who loves must share the fate of the one he loves.

What is this devastation of yours? Old woman with a stick? The witch who broke all the windows and put out all the lamps? Yes, it doesn’t exist at all. What do you mean by this word? This is this: if, instead of operating every evening, I start singing in chorus in my apartment, I will be in ruins. If, entering the restroom, I start, excuse the expression, urinating past the toilet and Zina and Daria Petrovna do the same, devastation will begin in the restroom. Consequently, the devastation is not in the closets, but in the heads. This means that when these baritones shout “beat the destruction!” - I am laughing. I swear to you, I find it funny! This means that each of them must hit themselves in the back of the head! And so, when he hatches all sorts of hallucinations from himself and starts cleaning the barns - his direct business - the devastation will disappear by itself.

The novel “The Master and Margarita” became the crowning achievement of Mikhail Bulgakov’s work and brought him posthumous world fame. There is hardly a reader among us who will take it upon himself to claim that he has unraveled all the secrets and riddles hidden in the work. Indeed, “The Master and Margarita” is a book that can be reread dozens of times, but never fully understood. An immortal, mysterious and witty novel full of adventure, irony and, of course, wisdom.

“A man without a surprise inside, in his box, is uninteresting”

* * *

“He who loves must share the fate of the one he loves”

* * *

"Sometimes The best way to destroy a person is to let him choose his own fate.”

* * *

“Do you agree that probably only the one who hung it can cut the hair?”

First publication of the novel “The Master and Margarita”. Moscow magazine, No. 11, 1966. Photo from the site ru. wikipedia.org

“Never ask for anything! Never and nothing, and especially among those who are stronger than you. They will offer and give everything themselves!”

* * *

“Insult is a common reward for good work.”

* * *

“Something, if you please, evil lurks in men who avoid wine, games, the company of lovely women, and table conversation. Such people are either seriously ill or secretly hate those around them. True, exceptions are possible. Among the people who sat down with me at the banquet table, I sometimes came across amazing scoundrels!”

* * *

“The second freshness is nonsense! There is only one freshness - the first, and it is also the last. And if the sturgeon is second freshness, then this means that it is rotten!”

Sergey Panasenko-Mikhalkin. "Farewell to Moscow." Illustration for the novel “The Master and Margarita” by M. A. Bulgakov, 1995. Photo from the site ru. wikipedia.org

“Cowardice is one of the most terrible human vices. - No, I dare to object to you. Cowardice is the most terrible human vice."

* * *

Be careful with your wishes - they tend to come true.

A novel by Mikhail Bulgakov "Master and Margarita"- the brightest masterpiece and the most mysterious of the novels in the entire history of Russian literature of the 20th century. A book that you can read and reread dozens, hundreds of times, but never fully understand. The cult novel is full of adventures, mysteries, irony and endless wisdom.

The novel was first published only 26 years after the author’s death, in 1966, and even then only in an abbreviated form. magazine version. The novel immediately gained popularity and was distributed in hand-typed copies until its official publication in 1973.

1. Who told you that there is no true, faithful, eternal love in the world? May the liar's vile tongue be cut out!
2. We speak different languages, as always, but the things we talk about do not change.
3. An unhappy person is cruel and callous. And all just because good people mutilated him.
4. Sometimes the best way to destroy a person is to let him choose his own fate.
5. A person without a surprise inside, in his box, is uninteresting.
6. Everything will be right, the world is built on this.
7. – Margarita Nikolaevna did not need money. Margarita Nikolaevna could buy whatever she liked. Among her husband's acquaintances there were interesting people. Margarita Nikolaevna never touched a primus stove. Margarita Nikolaevna did not know the horrors of living in a shared apartment.
   - In a word... Was she happy?
   - Not a single minute!
8. Understand that the tongue can hide the truth, but the eyes can never!
9. It's nice to hear that you treat your cat so politely. For some reason, cats are usually called “you,” although not a single cat has ever drunk brotherhood with anyone.
10. Yes, man is mortal, but that would not be so bad. The bad thing is that he is sometimes suddenly mortal, that's the trick!
11. Do you judge by the suit? Never do this. You can make a mistake, and a very big one at that.
12. He who loves must share the fate of the one he loves.
13. There are no evil people in the world, there are only unhappy people.
14. - Is this vodka? – Margarita asked weakly.
    The cat jumped up in his chair from offense.
    “For mercy, queen,” he croaked, “would I allow myself to pour vodka for the lady?” This is pure alcohol!
15. A brick will never fall on anyone's head for no reason at all..
16. “You are not Dostoevsky,” said the citizen, confused by Koroviev.
    “Well, who knows, who knows,” he answered.
    “Dostoevsky died,” said the citizen, but somehow not very confidently.
    “I protest,” Behemoth exclaimed hotly. – Dostoevsky is immortal!
17. People are like people. They love money, but this has always been the case... Humanity loves money, no matter what it is made of, whether leather, paper, bronze or gold. Well, frivolous... well, well... ordinary people... in general, they resemble the old ones... the housing issue only spoiled them...
18. Never ask for anything! Never and nothing, and especially among those who are stronger than you. They will offer and give everything themselves!
19. The most interesting thing about this lie is that it is a lie from the first to the last word.
20. All theories are worth one another. Among them there is one according to which everyone will be given according to their faith. May it come true!
21. Nonsense! In three hundred years this will pass.
22. What country's wine do you prefer at this time of day?
23. My drama is that I live with someone I don’t love, but I consider it unworthy to ruin his life.
24. – Cowardice is one of the most terrible human vices.
    – I dare to object to you. Cowardice is the most terrible human vice.
25. Never be afraid of anything. This is unreasonable.
26. The most terrible anger is the anger of powerlessness.
27. I'll tell you a fairy tale. There was only one aunt in the world. And she had no children and no happiness at all. And so at first she cried for a long time, and then she became angry.
28. Annushka has already bought sunflower oil, and not only bought it, but even bottled it. So the meeting will not take place.
29. What would your good do if evil did not exist, and what would the earth look like if shadows disappeared from it?
30. No matter what pessimists say, the earth is still absolutely beautiful, and under the moon it is simply unique.

In a psychiatric hospital, Ivan, due to circumstances insurmountable for him, was forced to do the work of the utmost usefulness in all sorts of pre-crisis and crisis situations: rethinking its past life and intentions for the future. Thus, ending up in the clinic for Ivan (as for many real people who are unable to break free with their meaningful will from the flow of vanity that carries them through life) was a providential blessing, since otherwise he would have written poetry until the end of his days - “monstrous! » (according to his conscience), from which he himself felt sick.

In the novel, this psychiatric hospital is a node in which plot lines are intertwined, containing various fragments of the story “about Pilate.” This storyline is presented in three fragments:

· the first (chapter 2) can conditionally be called “The Gospel of Woland” - its narrative, reaching the point of obvious evidence, about the events of the beginning of our era that took place on the 14th of the spring month of Nisan in the city of Yershalaim, to Berlioz and Bezdomny, while the three of them were sitting on a bench at the Patriarchal Dams and each in his own way “waited for the tram”;

· the second (chapter 16) - a dream that Ivan Bezdomny, pumped up with sedatives, had during his stay in a psychiatric hospital;

· the third (chapter 25) - Woland again materialized one of the burned copies of the manuscript of the master’s novel about Pilate (when the manuscript materialized, Margarita, admiring Woland, said something stupid: “All-powerful, all-powerful!” - although only God is all-powerful and all-powerful).

For the most part, it is this plot “about Pilate” that literary scholars and readers, who equally have a demonic structure of the psyche, identify with the theological views of M.A. Bulgakov himself, without fully pursuing the idea that he chose in general to express his supposed opinion - then unseemly “lyrical heroes”. This circumstance - the unseemly nature of the "lyrical heroes" and the places of action in which this plot is revealed to the reader - leads us to the conclusion that he did not disguise the "Gospel of Michael" as the "Gospel of Woland" or a "novel within a novel" written by a master , in relation to which all other storylines are the supporting basis and frame; and that the “Gospel of Michael” is the entire novel in the interweaving of all its plot lines, without exception or giving selective preference to any one of them. At the same time, many things, due to the specifics of the characters involved in the plot, are simply unacceptable to be understood directly and literally, since otherwise a logical conclusion to nonsense like the following is inevitable:

“In May 1939, Bulgakov made fundamental changes to this episode: Matvey Levi appears in front of Woland with request(in bold by V. Losev) Yeshua is about Satan “taking the master with him and rewarding him with peace.” Thus, Bulgakov in a later edition moves away from the concept of the subordination of the “kingdom of darkness” to the “kingdom of light” and makes them at least equal in rights” (Viktor Losev, Comments on the publication of chapters from early versions of the novel in the magazine “Slovo”, No. 8 , 1991, p. 74).

We will comment on this episode later, and now let’s return to the plot “about Pilate” as a whole. To those familiar with the New Testament texts, it is perceived as another version, repeating the New Testament messages, although differing from them in some details, which - depending on their correlation with other circumstances or their isolation - seem either insignificant or extremely important . Moreover, from the point of view of the majority, who are not guardians of the faith in the impeccable accuracy of the canonical biblical narratives, there are no special discrepancies with the canonical texts in this plot. Everything is the same at a superficial glance: they were arrested on the denunciation of Judas; the Sanhedrin sentenced him to death and submitted the sentence to the procurator for approval; the procurator did not want to approve the death sentence, but under pressure from the threat of denunciation against himself to the Roman Emperor Tiberius, he became cowardly and approved the sentence; crucified along with the robbers; died on the cross; buried, though not in the same way and not there, as the canonical New Testament texts tell about it... Although in this plot there is no, firstly, what Yeshua did before his arrest; secondly, what happened after the burial of the body, nevertheless, everything is recognizable, and what was not said is known from the biblical culture common to all. What's special here?

For the majority, the question does not arise to what extent what M.A. Bulgakov left in silence will coincide with what is directly said in the New Testament texts. Moreover, for them the question arising from the first does not arise: to what extent do they coincide in what exactly Do the silences diverge on the one hand from M.A. Bulgakov, and on the other hand from the authors, censors and editors of New Testament texts?

But in order to continue considering this storyline and related issues further, it is necessary to remember that many writers argued that their characters live an independent life in their works, regardless of the will and intentions of the author of the work. This happens because the author, having conceived a character, imagines a certain personality in his psyche, endowing it, according to his understanding, with morality, knowledge, worldview and everything else that characterizes every individual. After this, a more or less independent algorithmic module is formed in the author’s psyche, which is an artistic image-character, which acts “automatically” in the plot, based on everything that the author has provided it with in the “virtual reality” of the world he has invented. This concept of artistic creativity explains why the the character's personality acts in the plot more or less independently of the author himself, whose psyche works on the basis of different morality, different knowledge, different thinking algorithms.

According to this understanding of artistic creativity, it is not the writer who, having created some kind of storyline, distributes its “theatrical enactment” between the characters, but the characters he imagines “live real life” in the psyche of the author, composing this storyline in his imaginary world alternately or in parallel, mutually complementing or refuting each other, and the author’s inner vision is only present. At the same time, some characters, having a certain independence in the author’s psyche, can rely on common arrays of information known to the author, and allocated for a certain group of characters in his psyche; or, through the author’s psyche, have direct access to the information of egregors into which the author is included, even if he does not have conscious access to this information or denies the possibility of its existence anywhere other than in the world of his work. In such a concept and in the life practice of artistic creativity, the author is left with the task of providing a sufficient number of characters, correcting their personal qualities, and through this, adjusting the algorithms of their interaction in the plot of the work. Sometimes the work is completed on the first try in one go, and sometimes it takes a lot of time to adjust the algorithm for plot development and its individual fragments decades pass.

It's all similar computer game, but the creation of which and the development of its algorithms take place in the psyche of the author, and not in the computer software environment.

Only in this mode of creativity does a work of art emerge “as if it were alive.” When the author himself constructs a storyline and then distributes its “theatrical enactment” among the puppets he designed and painted to resemble the characters, the result is a lifeless “ music Box”, which is set in motion by an energy “spring”, unfolding first from the psyche of the author himself, and then from the psyche of the reader.

An example of this kind of psycho-mechanical mobile structures that work vampirically at the expense of the reader’s energy is “Demons” by F.M. Dostoevsky, who himself admitted that this novel of his is the result of constructing a plot with predetermined results. In M.A. Bulgakov’s “The Master and Margarita” it really turned out “like in life”, but not a dead vampiric psycho-mechanical structure.

Therefore, before moving on to the consideration of the embedded plot “about Pilate”, it is necessary to list the main characters of the entire novel who are directly in contact with this plot:

· first of all, this is an anonymous narrator, to whom the author is given to witness the development of all the plot lines of our time, to view the dreams of other characters , read their thoughts, and then talk about it, intertwining various storylines with each other;

· Woland, representing the image of Satan, formed in the psyche of M.A. Bulgakov himself on the basis of informal theological education in the family and his own observations of the flow of events in real life;

· a master whose essence is clear without much explanation: he was engaged in science, fell into a “crisis of the genre”, as a result of which he moved away from scientific research and began to resolve his moral and ideological problems (internal contradictions in the psyche, conscious and unconscious to him) in artistic creativity, which led him to another crisis, in which he was hopelessly stuck;

· Margarita, has nothing to do with the intellectual-rational development and provision of the plot “about Pilate” with information about the facts of the religious history of mankind: in relation to this plot, she is one of the first passionate about him readers and, perhaps, the “muse” that directly inspired the master’s creativity, since psychologically, and above all emotionally, the master was almost completely dependent on her.

· Ivan Ponyrev, bearer of the literary pseudonym “Bezdomny”, which could be called in parallel with his main pseudonym and his second pseudonym: Durdomny.

But if these were characters who can be called primary in relation to the plot “about Pilate”, then in this very plot line there are also secondary characters, not in the sense that they have secondary significance, but in the sense that they themselves - such as they appear in the novel are the creation of the named primary characters: Woland, Bezdomny, the master, from whose faces the storyline “about Pilate” is narrated in the novel. As a result, the secondary characters turned out to be Pilate himself, Yeshua, Matthew Levi, the head of the Sanhedrin (Sanhedrin - in another transliteration; translated into Russian - the Supreme Council) and the High Priest Caif. Therefore, one should distinguish when an anonymous person speaks about one of them. narrator (witness to everything he describes), and when someone else from the primary characters talks about them. At the same time, all the primary characters associated with the storyline “about Pilate” are united by certain common arrays of information, characteristic both of the psyche of M.A. Bulgakov himself, and accessible through the egregors to which it was closed. Based on the arrays of this information, the primary characters act, and from them they select information about the secondary characters, in accordance with the morality, worldview, mental algorithms and other personal capabilities of each of the primary characters given to them by M.A. Bulgakov. These amounts of information are based on a real story ( for the most part memorable egregorial), and its reflection in historical myths characteristic of the culture of mankind, which in many ways differ from real history, since myths express people’s understanding of history, and not God’s Providence, carried out in the global historical process, in the predetermination of its meaning by God himself.

As a result, the storyline “about Pilate” develops as a mutually acceptable compromise between the primary characters, and is reflected in it - discreet, as in real life, is the Providence of God; more precisely, not Providence itself as such, but a characteristically figurative idea of ​​Providence that developed in the psyche of M.A. Bulgakov, corresponding to what was said in Chapter. 19 of the 3rd book of Kings and reflected in the plot of the novel.

Neither Woland, nor Durdomny, nor the master dispute the fragments of the plot presented by the other two narrators, and the confluence of circumstances is such that the personal copyright for the novel “about Pilate” goes to the master, who captured on paper what was hovering in the collective unconscious of Bulgakov’s invention the world in which the lives of the primary characters took place. Moreover, of these, only Woland’s consciousness was contemporary with the events described in the story “about Pilate”, as a result of which everything else can be viewed in part as satanic obsessions in the psyche of those evading the guidance of God. But since Woland himself acted within the boundaries of providential permission from Above, his story is not useless or meaningless for those who are sincerely determined to find the truth.

Of course, Woland hid from what he knew everything that he considered harmful for people to know as harmful to the implementation of his intentions both in relation to his interlocutors personally and in relation to all humanity. Somewhere he lied or gave the opportunity to others to be deceived; he blurted out something harmful to himself out of pride, based on the prejudice that “these stupid people” would not understand what he was communicating as they should; Berlioz immediately provided Woland with another reason to confirm his opinion, directing his feet under the tram. Woland blurted out something due to the limitations of his worldview and limited ability to foresee consequences. Well, the main thing:

Throughout his entire history of falling away from God, Satan himself repeatedly fell into self-deception, as a result of which both his memory and mental algorithms could not help but accumulate a fair amount of errors and misconceptions, which he is unable to identify and eliminate, persisting in his being at odds with God .

This means that essentially M.A. Bulgakov, without being a recognized certified theologian, worked on the problem: examination on the merits the possibility of imitation of Revelation from Above by Satan within the limits of the fundamentally possible permission for Satan to carry out this kind of action. Theologians of all faiths without exception are moving away from it, both in relation to what they themselves preach and in relation to what those of other faiths profess and preach.

Consideration of this problem cannot destroy or eradicate true faith, but it poses a danger of enslaving society to the cult of all kinds of social magic. Accordingly, by avoiding consideration of this issue, professional theologians of all faiths thereby testify to their lack of freedom, and, as a consequence, to their falling away from the Truth: “If you continue in My word, then you are truly My disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.”(as paraphrased in John 8:31, 32).

How the master reacted to everything told and inspired in his thoughts is known from the novel itself. Finding himself in a psychiatric hospital, he stole the keys from the nurse Praskovya Fedorovna, which is one of the characteristics of the real thieving morality of the master, and with their help he entered the ward where Ivan Bezdomny was burdened with himself. After Ivan, whose impressions had not yet been erased, it must be assumed, experiencing , word for word, he retold the “Gospel of Woland” to the master, the master exclaimed: “Oh, how I guessed right! Oh, how I guessed right!” By this, he recognized for himself the complete truth of the “good news from Woland”, which coincides with his novel, about the events that took place in Yershalaim at the beginning of the current era.

In our understanding of existence, if a person is interested in questions of the relationship between God and humanity and resolves questions that ariseGod willing before him in line with consideration of this problem, sincerely, without dissembling before his conscience, then with God's help these problems will be resolved righteously, and a person cannot become depressed, run away from people, become mentally ill or obsessed: he will become more and more cheerful, covering more and more aspects of life with his sanity strengthening in righteousness.

That is, everything that happened to the master suggests that something is false in his morality and, as a result, in his psyche. Therefore, at a minimum, he did not understand the truth of what he himself wrote, wading through the veil of lies, obsessions from Woland and the lies that had accumulated in the established culture, and at most, what he wrote was somehow false.

To answer essentially questions of this kind, it is necessary to consider two components of the master’s novel:

· one that repeats the testimony of the canonical New Testament Gospels;

· the one that contradicts them.

Let's start with what is contradictory. To the prosecutor's question:

My? - the arrested “Yeshua” hastily responded, expressing with all his being his readiness to answer intelligently, without causing any more anger. “Before this, centurion Mark the Ratboy took Yeshua out of the colonnade, where Pilate was interrogating him, hit him with a whip, and explained how to behave in front of the procurator.”

The procurator said quietly:

Mine - I know. Don't pretend to be more stupid than you are. Your.

Yeshua,” the prisoner hastily answered.

Do you have a nickname?

Where you're from?

From the city of Gamala,” the prisoner answered, indicating with his head that there, somewhere far away, to the right of him, in the north, there was the city of Gamala.

Who are you by blood?

“I don’t know for sure,” the arrested man answered briskly, “I don’t remember my parents.” They told me that my father was Syrian..."

Yeshua's answer to the question equally denies both biblical and Koranic evidence about the birth and childhood of Christ, according to which he knew his parents, knew about his conception by a righteous virgin from the Holy Spirit, which is unnatural according to everyday concepts.

In the version of events of “The Master and Margarita” Yeshua - a common person, of which there are many, but which differs from the overwhelming majority in that it is purposefully active, joyful and fearless with faith and trust in God , as his further replies to Pilate show, and generously shares his knowledge and understanding of what is happening and prospects with everyone around him who is ready to listen to him, making no exceptions for anyone.

After Yeshua helped Pilate by healing him from a migraine attack, Pilate ordered him to be untied, and the conversation continued:

“What do you want me to swear? - asked, very animated, untied.

Well, at least with your life,” answered the procurator, “it’s time to swear by it, since it hangs by a thread, know this!”

Don't you think that you have hung her up, hegemon? - asked the prisoner, - if this is so, then you are very mistaken.

Pilate shuddered and answered through clenched teeth:

I can cut this hair.

And in this you are mistaken,” the prisoner objected, smiling brightly and shielding himself from the sun with his hand, “Do you agree that only the one who hung it can probably cut the hair?”

“Yes, yes,” said Pilate, smiling...”

The hint was made very transparently and in Russian is expressed in the proverb “we all walk under God,” and without His Holy will, not only will no one’s life be cut short, but not a single hair will fall from the head. And the entire behavior of Yeshua in this dialogue shows that he joyfully trusted his life, death and posthumous existence to God.

“So, so,” Pilate said, smiling, “now I have no doubt that the idle onlookers in Yershalaim followed on your heels.” I don’t know who hung your tongue, but it hung well. By the way, tell me: is it true that you appeared in Yershalaim through the Susa Gate riding on a donkey, accompanied by a crowd of rabble shouting greetings to you as if you were some kind of prophet? - here the procurator pointed to a scroll of parchment.

The prisoner looked at the procurator in bewilderment.

“I don’t even have a donkey, hegemon,” he said. “I came to Yershalaim exactly through the Susa Gate, but on foot, accompanied by only Levi Matvey, and no one shouted anything to me, since no one knew me in Yershalaim then.”

This is a refutation of the scene of Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem on a young donkey to the joyful cries of the crowd “Hosanna! Hosanna!”, which is what the biblical confessional tradition of churches named after Christ insists on.

“Don’t you know such people,” continued Pilate, without taking his eyes off the prisoner, “a certain Dismas, another Gestas and a third Bar-Rabban?

“I don’t know these good people,” the prisoner answered.

Now tell me, what are you doing all the time using the words “good people”? Is that what you call everyone?

“All,” the prisoner answered, “there are no evil people in the world.”

This is the first time I’ve heard about this,” Pilate said, grinning, “but maybe I don’t know life much!” You don’t have to write down anything further,” he turned to the secretary, although he didn’t write anything down anyway, and continued to say to the prisoner: “Did you read about this in any of the Greek books?”

No, I came to this with my own mind.

And you preach this?

The doctrine proclaimed by Yeshua and openly preached by him about the universal kindness of people knows no exceptions, both in relation to all people in the aggregate, and in relation to each person personally.

He does not know, including in relation to Mark the Ratkiller, who brutally beat him, and Judas of Kiriath (Iscariot), who provoked him, at the instigation of the owners of the Sanhedrin, to violate the Roman law “on lese majeste.” This is not blindness to the question of who Yeshua is really dealing with (a sincere follower, a benevolent disciple, or a deliberate provocateur), as is understood by many.

This is the PRINCIPLE OF LIFE, which KNOWS NO EXCEPTIONS and assumes that God knows whom He brings Yeshua to and whom He brings to him; Yeshua’s duty, first of all, before God is to convey his understanding of the Truth to everyone with whom God allows him to meet. This principle is intended to be followed in his life by every person in all circumstances without exception.

And in relation to it, the question of whether the historically real Christ, like all people, was conceived in the copulation of a man and a woman, as reported in the “Gospel of Woland,” or conceived by the Holy Spirit, as the New Testament texts and the Koran assert, does not matter . Moreover, the incarnation of Christ, conceived by the Holy Spirit, as can be understood from the Bible, is not the most amazing incarnation. It describes another incarnation of God’s vicegerent on Earth, not only without a father, but also without a mother. In the Epistle to the Hebrews, the Apostle Paul in ch. 7 writes the following:

"1. For Melchizedek, king of Salem, priest of the Most High God, the one who met Abraham and blessed him, returning after the defeat of the kings, 2. to whom Abraham divided the tithe from everything (see the book of Genesis, ch. 14:18 - 20), - first, according to the sign of the name, the king of righteousness, and then the king of Salem, that is, the king of peace, 3. without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life(emphasized in italics when quoting: but still Melchizedek was not elevated to the rank of deity, even with all these wonderful properties), being likened to the Son of God, he remains a priest forever. 4. You see how great is he to whom Abraham the patriarch gave tithes of his best spoils.”

That is, the question of the method of incarnation is far from being as significant for life as it is presented to the flock of the Church of Christ. The question of the nature of the conception of Christ lies in a different area: if historically it really happened that in the era of the first coming there was not a single pair of men and women such that their heredity (physical and spiritual) would allow a person to be born and grow up who would be free from errors of the era and could reveal to everyone else that ideal of the dignity of Man, which is predetermined by the Almighty God, Creator and Almighty, so that all people would comprehend this undistorted ideal and embody it each in themselves, then God brought this ideal to life through the conception of Jesus Christ by a righteous Virgin from Holy Spirit.

But the churches named after Christ, focusing the attention of the church members on the mystery of the conception of Jesus, substitute their teachings about this event, which no one but God can repeat, understanding the question of the life principles that Jesus followed in his life in communication with all people and which, with God’s help, everyone is able to follow in their lives. And this is the anti-Christian essence of any supposedly Christian cult. And as a result of this centuries-old policy of the church hierarchs and their behind-the-scenes masters, one of the censures of one’s neighbor for his characteristic spiritual and material generosity and selflessness towards others in society results in a distinctly evil form : “Christ has been found...” and similar ones, in which the likening of a person to Christ for certain good qualities should be perceived by him as an insult and reproach.

In addition, M.A. Bulgakov’s accusations of blasphemous (from the point of view of those who call themselves “Christians”) refusal to acknowledge the fact of Christ’s conception from the Holy Spirit are groundless, no matter what church literary scholars say about this. It should be noted that the version of the conception of Christ from the Holy Spirit in the plot of the novel is directly challenged by the materialist atheist M.A. Berlioz in his lecture on mythology for Ivan Bezdomny, and in addition, it is expressed in one phrase in the “Gospel of Woland”. The only difference between the versions of Berlioz and Woland is that Berlioz did not know Christ during his lifetime and therefore disputes the very fact of his existence in the past; and Woland talks about Yeshua, whom he saw in life, as an ordinary righteous man abandoned by God, pursuing at least two goals in his story:

· firstly, to consign to oblivion one of the unpleasant facts of God’s direct intervention in earthly affairs, as a result of which the Most Pure Virgin Mary gave birth supernaturally Man in all the fullness of his dignity;

· and secondly, so that others would be discouraged from trusting God in earthly life and pinning their hopes on Him, by making false accusations against God Judas's sin of betraying a righteous man who trusted him.

But this same lie betrayal of God the righteous man who trusted in Him, starting from the stage of Predestination of the existence of the Universe, erected on God and the church named after Christ. M.A. Bulgakov, speaking in the person of the anonymous narrator leading the narration of the novel-parable, did not express his opinion on the issue of the conception of Christ, leaving it to each of the readers of the novel to answer it sincerely, according to his conscience, but as can be seen from the comments to the novel, the majority of literary critics, when answering this question, identify themselves with either Berlioz or Woland, attributing their characteristic views to M.A. Bulgakov.

And further: elevation to rank immaculate the exclusive conception of Christ by the Virgin Mary from the Holy Spirit is indeed one of the blasphemous, satanic provisions of church doctrine, which blasphemously assumes in silence that all other conceptions of people are doomed by God himself to be vicious. The conception of Christ by the Holy Spirit is miraculous and real immaculate. But also immaculate(although devoid of the aura of a supernatural miracle) every conception human spouses to whom God has given His Love. And such conception should become the norm in the life of society. Any conception that took place without God-given Love, that occurred merely on the basis of working out the algorithms of copulation between a man and a woman under the guidance of exclusively animal instincts or an excess of energy out of boredom, is vicious, regardless of whether such conception occurred in a marriage ritually sanctified by the church or whether it occurred in fornication of spouses or bachelors.

The rationale for the statement “there are no evil people in the world” in the novel is also simple:

“These good people (...) didn’t learn anything...”

In other words:

Evil - in a vicious culture, where righteous education has not been developed and where people learn the truth through mistakes,- is objectively inevitable, as a result of which it is objectively inappropriate to assign responsibility for it to any of them, i.e. This kind of accusation is unfair and is itself unjust, no matter what any of the people have done and no matter who accuses him of it.

Such a view, despite its apparent simplicity, does not, however, relieve a person of the obligation to strive for righteousness, and is not a proclamation as a norm of connivance towards a vicious lifestyle and the cult of vice, as it seems at first superficial glance: Yeshua himself sincerely lives in harmony with his conscience, and his activities are aimed at transforming the morality and psyche of everyone with whom he communicates, no matter how low the people around him have fallen, and no matter what evil they have done.

The overwhelming majority of those who do not agree with the teachings of Christian churches and who are familiar with the New Testament episode “Christ and the Sinner” (John, chapter 8), consider themselves free from the mission of finding the truth and enlightening others, and therefore such forgiveness is regarded as corruption carried out by default society and youth by the “obvious” (to them) impunity of vice. In Christian churches, the doctrine of forgiveness actually turns into a means of corrupting society with impunity for undeniable vice, due to the fact that the churches are stuck in the swamp of deadening dogmas, into which the Patriarchal dams have turned the living teaching of Christ.

The statement “there are no evil people in the world” is just a statement a fact hidden in the depths of the existence of the Universe, the awareness of which obliges everyone who understands this to develop and give people a true teaching about life, on the basis of which the kindness inherent in all of them will ineradicably manifest itself. But this is only the internal social side of what Yeshua said - his sociological doctrine, which he puts into practice through all his activities in all circumstances without exception:

“But, for example, the centurion Mark, they called him the Rat Slayer - is he kind?

Yes,” answered the prisoner, “he is, indeed, an unhappy man.” Since good people disfigured him, he has become cruel and callous. (...) If I could talk to him,” the prisoner suddenly said dreamily, “I’m sure he would change dramatically.” (...)

I see that some misfortune has happened because I spoke to this young man from Kiriath. I, the hegemon, have a presentiment that misfortune will happen to him, and I feel very sorry for him.

“I think,” the procurator answered with a strange smile, “that there is someone else in the world whom you should feel sorry for more than Judas of Kiriath, and who will have much worse than Judas!” So, Mark the Ratboy, a cold and convinced executioner, people who, as I see,” the procurator pointed to the disfigured face of Yeshua, “they beat you for your sermons, the robbers Dismas and Gestas, who killed four soldiers with their associates, and finally, the dirty traitor Judas - are they all good people?

Yes, the prisoner answered.

And will the kingdom of truth come?

It will come, hegemon,” Yeshua answered with conviction.

It will never come! - Pilate suddenly shouted in such a terrible voice that Yeshua recoiled. (...) he even raised his commanding voice, calling out the words so that they could hear in the garden: - Criminal! Criminal! Criminal!

Yeshua Ha-Nozri, do you believe in any gods?

“There is only one God,” Yeshua answered, “I believe in Him, “I believe and trust Him, we will add when quoting.”

So pray to him! Pray harder! However,” here Pilate’s voice sank, “this will not help...”

In fearless faith in God, at one “pole”, and in disbelief in God, stemming from various fears, regardless of faith in God or lack of faith in Him, at the other “pole” - the limits of differences between all kind people. There are no evil people in the world.